Foxconn TPDS06

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Foxconn TPDS06 (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN D42S 3.0/D52S 3.0
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '16 at 01:53
Run Duration	1048 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Memory 40.7 1-Core 7.5 2-Core 13.3 17% 20.5 Pts	4-Core 19.1 8-Core 21.8 3% 20.5 Pts	64-Core 22.8 1% 22.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4295688201 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 50 40 257698037810 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 12885164036 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 67 (EA) Unknown 100 100 84 (F1) Unknown 253 253 77 (F2) Unknown 253 253 11 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	25.1% Poor	Read 236 Write 85.1 Mixed 179 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 3.46 34% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 30.8 DQ Mixed 1.91 7% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 86%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 43GB free Firmware: ZH100-47 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 3968 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6583 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18843 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3396 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 115 76 41 (C2) HDA temperature 115 76 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1294891 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	24.8% Poor	Read 36.5 Write 49.7 Mixed 33 30% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.35 78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 22GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 20.7 Mixed 25.1 32% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.51 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.11 22% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15 1,780 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.98% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 2.06 Mixed 3.59 6% 6.31 MB/s	4K Read 2.37 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 10% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.98% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Foxconn TPDS06

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)