Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Dell OptiPlex 9010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 9010 (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130812
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '16 at 23:15
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 98 2-Core 202 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 429 47% 373 Pts	64-Core 510 32% 510 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.7% Very good	Lighting 95.5 Reflection 104 Parallax 107 78% 102 fps	MRender 91.2 Gravity 94.9 Splatting 96.3 77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 50GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 122006138 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -135308649689560 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 190 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 25 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 46 21477851160 (C2) HDA temperature 24 46 21477851160 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 122006138 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 122006138 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 122006138 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294965570 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3107 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3107 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1946 (F4) Unknown 99 99 6619192	60.7% Good	Read 505 Write 188 Mixed 264 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 12.2 75% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 42.7 66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3296 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 284 (B1) Unknown 98 98 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12686960243	77.5% Very good	Read 507 Write 405 Mixed 402 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 20.5 102% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 36.4 DQ Write 61.5 DQ Mixed 19.8 23% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 602GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 28887592 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 605 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 6659170 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3276 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 275 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 554762270 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18060 (C2) HDA temperature 30 42 12884901918 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21397527067920 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5622899389 (F2) Unknown 100 253 119793676742	85.7% Excellent	Read 160 Write 139 Mixed 140 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.2 88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB 13,591 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,841x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	770x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	674x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	469x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	360x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	359x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	56x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16