Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '16 at 15:40
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 606
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 80.3
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 73
66% 78.1 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 65
58% 72.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 369
Write 256
Mixed 260
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 19.9
95% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 14.4
50% 111 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 126%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
270GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 114
Mixed 119
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.34
94% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
460GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 61.2
Mixed 51.6
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.14
58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
151GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 87.5
Write 71.5
Mixed 71.3
58% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback