Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '16 at 11:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 152
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 580
51% 435 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.44
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 8.61
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0414B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.3% Good
Read 267
Write 248
Mixed 233
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 32.5
100% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 81.5
87% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 113%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
364GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 93.7
Mixed 54.6
61% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 75%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
233GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 119
Write 115
Mixed 71.2
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 3.17
4K Mixed 0.63
171% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 80%
Hitachi HTS54501 160GB
124GB free
Firmware: CA0G
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 54.7
Mixed 51.8
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.29
73% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback