| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 06 '16 at 20:52 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.1%
Good
|
60% 96 Pts
|
42% 346 Pts
|
27% 441 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.4
|
35.1%
Below average
|
36% 49.3 fps
|
34% 42.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
69.4%
Good
|
73% 333 MB/s
|
85% 26.7 MB/s
|
62% 107 MB/s
|
|
|
36%
Below average
|
38% 52.1 MB/s
|
91% 0.71 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.5%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
57% 69.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |