MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7885
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160525
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '16 at 20:20
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 227 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 690 65% 540 Pts	64-Core 847 52% 847 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.70 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Lighting 80.3 Reflection 78.9 Parallax 68.2 65% 75.8 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 73.9 60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 480GB-$192 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4663 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1144 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 27 (A8) Unknown 100 100 127 (A9) Unknown 100 100 595 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 30 (AE) Unknown 100 100 106 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 141 605591240737 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 256 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 15945 (F1) Unknown 253 253 7138 (F2) Unknown 253 253 14916 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	91.8% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 367 Mixed 350 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 25.5 133% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 65.8 101% 193 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 110%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 19GB free Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24485 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2327 (AA) Unknown 100 100 8819 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 441 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 10471130269067 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 276 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 8 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	57.4% Above average	Read 356 Write 137 Mixed 196 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 4.64 98% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 21.2 58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 62%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79 6,615 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 302GB free Firmware: 3.AAM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6310 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 844415078 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 23741 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3640 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 39 622133285 (C2) HDA temperature 37 61 60129542181 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 54 2622854 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 155 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	37.4% Below average	Read 64.6 Write 66 Mixed 65.3 49% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 254GB free Firmware: 3.AFD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 80 107275727 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 481 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 45 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 881152259 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 30880 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 248 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 7274 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 30 -3723296734 (C2) HDA temperature 34 70 68719476770 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 51 60586581 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 99 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.1% Below average	Read 62.4 Write 42.6 Mixed 49.4 39% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.12 23% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 44%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 155GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 174 2050 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3918 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11536 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1525 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 146 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3771 (C2) HDA temperature 121 91 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	93.1% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 159 Mixed 157 121% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 4.19 4K Mixed 0.4 168% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 35.7 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 14.8 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	397x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	244x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	30x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	34x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16