Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '16 at 00:48
Run Duration	334 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 137 59% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 397 39% 321 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.9 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 116 Parallax 97 89% 107 fps	MRender 98 Gravity 103 Splatting 102 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 46GB free Firmware: 1.5. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 5 0 5 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10644 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 870 (E8) Unknown 100 100 20120576943 (E9) Unknown 99 0 99	82.5% Excellent	Read 438 Write 419 Mixed 371 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 29 108% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 72.9 73% 118 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 106%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10795 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 756 (B1) Unknown 93 93 83 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 37 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 52089384861	49.9% Average	Read 499 Write 255 Mixed 320 79% 358 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 1.63 54% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 126%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 262GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 174 170 6266 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5291 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24680 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1986 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 212 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 40151 (C2) HDA temperature 123 90 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.6% Above average	Read 122 Write 85.5 Mixed 84.9 73% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.16 68% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 29GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 169 165 6541 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9460 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18438 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1362 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 40707 (C2) HDA temperature 122 92 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	88% Excellent	Read 184 Write 122 Mixed 104 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.23 89% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 168 8091 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4127 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13338 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 905 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 24 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27162 (C2) HDA temperature 123 93 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.4% Above average	Read 90 Write 85.5 Mixed 85.3 66% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.25 85% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 87%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 48GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 92.2 Write 94.6 Mixed 49.8 98% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.19 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 44%
WDC WD32 00AAKS-00B3A0 320GB 30GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	Read 74.7 Write 76.5 Mixed 62.9 91% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.25 80% 0.89 MB/s

WDC WD32 00AAKS-00B3A0 320GB 13GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.6% Below average	Read 72.8 Write 102 Mixed 56.4 101% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.37 88% 0.98 MB/s

WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 83.8 Write 99.5 Mixed 80.4 115% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.2 76% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-173.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-173.A00LF 12GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.4% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 12.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16