Apple Macmini5,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple Macmini5,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-4BC72D62AD45599E
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '16 at 00:17
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 167
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Apple(106B 00E8) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.2.0.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXF 500GB
257GB free
Firmware: GP006B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 56.5
Mixed 25.1
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.31
76% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 44%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 1GB
1GB free, PID 4060
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3% Terrible
Read 8.44
Write 6.18
Mixed 7.11
9% 7.24 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.09
8% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 5%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
1GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 24.3
Mixed 8.57
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.16
18% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 38%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB
1GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 20.9
Mixed 8.85
21% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.34
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Macmini5,2 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini5,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $34
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback