Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H170M-E D3  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160922
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '16 at 13:35
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 211
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 630
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 7.91
6% 9.09 fps
MRender 9.33
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 16.5
10% 11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 156
Parallax 141
120% 148 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 139
Splatting 109
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 64.9
59% 70.5 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 67
Splatting 58.3
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
521GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 479
Write 321
Mixed 335
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 27.2
113% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 51.9
88% 174 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 105%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
261GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 483
Write 220
Mixed 132
60% 278 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 10.9
81% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 23.9
64% 141 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 92%
Intel X25-M 160GB
58GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
44% Average
Read 255
Write 104
Mixed 150
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 7.36
78% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 48.8
56% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
611GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 97.5
Write 67.6
Mixed 66.3
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.08
41% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback