Lenovo 10382HG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 10382HG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '16 at 04:51
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 39
27% 38 Pts
4-Core 39.4
8-Core 39.5
5% 39.5 Pts
64-Core 39.8
2% 39.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310M
Legend(17AA 397B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.792.3.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2Z Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 49.3
40% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.29
69% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 484D543332355336 0443 524D543330323045 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback