Toshiba Qosmio X500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X500 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA QOSMIO X500
Memory	3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090930
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '15 at 12:47
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 66.4 2-Core 91.9 38% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 252 25% 202 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M 297 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.5912 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.83 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 2.06 4% 4.16 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 3 3% 4.08 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 219 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 258 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 53 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 56 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1398330873	39.4% Below average	Read 254 Write 178 Mixed 177 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 12 50% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 49 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 26.5 34% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 126%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 354GB free Firmware: FG001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1614 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4333 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 5289 (0A) Spinup retry count 185 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4271 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 146 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 382009687 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 108219 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 249108627489 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8226 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3446 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 342 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	26.7% Poor	Read 47.2 Write 45.6 Mixed 29.4 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.25 68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 126GB 365 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 8.57 Mixed 8.65 16% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.35 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.31 23% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X500 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X500

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	49x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	44x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GTS 360MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,262 samples	53x
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	28x
GeForce GTS 250MNvidiaBench 4%, 297 samples	22x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 611 samples	10x
HMT351S6AFR8C-G7 2x4GBHynixBench 29%, 370 samples	9x
M471B5273BH1-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 494 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba Qosmio X500

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba Qosmio X500

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)