MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A21
MotherboardMSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 30 '16 at 01:01
Run Duration468 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 184
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 672
60% 509 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1564 MHz, MLim: 1825 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 347.25
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 19.2
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.8
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 506
Write 261
Mixed 248
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 21.7
110% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 47.7
80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 124%
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
77GB free
Firmware: L2010420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 500
Write 261
Mixed 253
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 20.2
111% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 63.7
84% 153 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 95%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
466GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 187
Mixed 157
134% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1.67
4K Write 3.87
4K Mixed 0.45
191% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
463GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 3.14
57% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.16
95% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
277GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 61.5
Write 38.4
Mixed 43.3
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.25
69% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 43%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
356GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 154
Mixed 133
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 4.08
4K Mixed 0.38
158% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 117%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
152GB free
Firmware: JE4OA50A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 82.2
Write 78.8
Mixed 14.4
42% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 53%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
66GB free
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 65.4
Mixed 41.9
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.24
87% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 85.9
Mixed 53.2
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 62%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 248GB
39GB free, PID 1a15, Corsair 256Gb Voyager Slider X1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 230
Write 22.2
Mixed 49.4
89% 101 MB/s
4K Read 7.29
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.003
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40%
Great: 66%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$13
32GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 112
Write 16
Mixed 16.6
42% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.42
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 1.07
82% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 51%
Lexar microSD RDR 64GB
22GB free, PID b051, Lexar MicroSD Flash 64GB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 70.4
Write 50.5
Mixed 37.9
63% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.84
4K Write 4.17
4K Mixed 2.84
271% 5.28 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 38.6
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21) Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback