| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150115 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 27 '16 at 20:58 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.4%
Very good
|
81% 142 Pts
|
40% 299 Pts
|
19% 302 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
|
3.73%
Terrible
|
3% 5.59 fps
|
5% 5.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
84% 382 MB/s
|
166% 58.7 MB/s
|
50% 96 MB/s
|
|
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 16GB-$29
4GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
33% 27.1 MB/s
|
52% 2.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.8%
Above average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
62% 64.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,134 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 155x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 77x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $674 |