Asus G75VW

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G75VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G75VW
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '16 at 13:40
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 172 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 432 49% 383 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M 7,381 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 2115) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.46 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.01% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 10.3 8% 9.31 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.43 Splatting 12.1 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.01% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 274GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1539 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 61 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 562 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1042	66.7% Good	Read 511 Write 349 Mixed 351 89% 404 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 10.3 63% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 49.8 64% 118 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 531 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 23 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 52 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1899524175	93.2% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 406 Mixed 413 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 40.8 130% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 71 78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 134%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 283GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 68.7 Write 66.1 Mixed 61.2 83% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.32 44% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 31%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 8GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 21.3 Mixed 25.9 32% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.39 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.92 87% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB 1,421 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	346x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	248x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	342x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	274x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	29x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	60x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16