Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '16 at 00:15
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 96 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 722 72% 589 Pts	64-Core 924 57% 924 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.86 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 59.9 56% 64.9 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 62 Splatting 57.2 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 54%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.86 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 38.9 28% 34.6 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 34.3 32% 39 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 111GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13307 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2079 (B1) Unknown 93 93 84 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 903 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20034906222	64.1% Good	Read 505 Write 128 Mixed 197 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 10.5 96% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 27.7 66% 143 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 95GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2633 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 549 (B1) Unknown 99 99 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 8 (EB) Unknown 99 99 244 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4381682184
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,591 Write 872 Mixed 1,065 260% 1,176 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 48.6 196% 71.8 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 137 145% 243 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 243%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 80GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10951 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1855 (B1) Unknown 95 95 59 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 47 47 53 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 875 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37960992264	86.9% Excellent	Read 499 Write 316 Mixed 351 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 25.6 127% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 80.5 99% 178 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 118%
Seagate ST91000640NS 1TB 1,135 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 268GB free Firmware: SN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 63 104035378 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2029 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 214848493 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10998 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1906 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 47245361586 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 44 34 127123382599736 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 888 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5052 (C2) HDA temperature 56 66 34359738424 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 116 99 104035378 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	38.9% Below average	Read 60.6 Write 74.6 Mixed 60.9 49% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.59 127% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 64%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 254GB free Firmware: SN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 63 78875505 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3481 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 891043873 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12398 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2020 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 48 47 408912199732 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 948 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3613 (C2) HDA temperature 52 53 -140737488355276 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 18 3 78875505 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77.1% Very good	Read 139 Write 129 Mixed 130 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.37 117% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 103%
WD WD1600SD-01KCC0 160GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 109GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 128 120 6125 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1467 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 38366 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1150 (C2) HDA temperature 99 93 51 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	24.4% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 42.8 Mixed 39.3 31% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.35 90% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 33%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 76GB free Firmware: JA0OA480 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 177 177 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1545 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 4166 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1206 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 125 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 33726 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 261993725993 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 57	31.4% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 53 Mixed 54.3 41% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.18 59% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 40GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 8 (03) Spinup time 178 173 4083 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2474 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12378 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1961 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 911 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1562 (C2) HDA temperature 100 97 47 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.3% Below average	Read 68.1 Write 65 Mixed 67.1 50% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.39 96% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 10,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	141% Outstanding	MC Read 49.9 MC Write 65.9 MC Mixed 52.3 160% 56 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 22.4 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16