HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z640 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 212A
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160525
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '16 at 08:46
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 755 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 153 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 621 54% 462 Pts	64-Core 1,744 108% 1,744 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.9% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 149 Parallax 137 101% 137 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 134 Splatting 109 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB 1,482 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 465GB free Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5447 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1151 (B1) Unknown 95 95 179 (B2) Unknown 93 93 360 (B3) Unknown 93 93 708 (B4) Unknown 93 93 9788 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0	147% Outstanding	Read 989 Write 914 Mixed 945 212% 949 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 81.8 4K Mixed 39.6 132% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 100 110% 188 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 166%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 164GB free Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12137 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 929 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 55 (AE) Unknown 100 100 44 (B5) Unknown 100 100 10136166008484 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 81 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	64.6% Good	Read 500 Write 257 Mixed 343 81% 367 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 5.74 73% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 5.13 56% 130 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 74%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4953 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 857 (B1) Unknown 98 98 96 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14305363813	87.2% Excellent	Read 510 Write 296 Mixed 393 88% 400 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 35 126% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 108 112% 185 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 82GB free Firmware: 1A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1643 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4786 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 849 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 61 504692766 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1599 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.1% Very good	Read 158 Write 114 Mixed 98.2 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.26 107% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 109%
NORELSYS 106X 2TB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 141GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 41.4 Write 41.7 Mixed 15.9 40% 33 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.43 76% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A1G40DB0-CPB Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 32GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.8% Good	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 21.6 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 15.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	113x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	100x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	97x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	146x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	115x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	62x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	50x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	33x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	33x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	45x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	38x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 61%, 375 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $509

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16