| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131003 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 16 '16 at 15:15 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70%
Good
|
63% 101 Pts
|
40% 323 Pts
|
27% 430 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
92% 111 fps
|
78% 98 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
89.2%
Excellent
|
86% 387 MB/s
|
137% 50.5 MB/s
|
111% 178 MB/s
|
|
|
87%
Excellent
|
115% 153 MB/s
|
83% 0.89 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 18.3 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
62% 64.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 298 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $775 |