Toshiba SATELLITE NB10t-A-101

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE NB10t-A-101 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA MA10
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '16 at 18:34
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2810 466 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 49.6 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 19.7 22% 28.1 Pts	4-Core 31.1 8-Core 31.9 4% 31.5 Pts	64-Core 28.7 2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FBB0) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.86 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 468GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 59 176095035431 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 66064987 (F7) Unknown 100 100 2093558 (F8) Unknown 100 100 207851 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1938 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	34.7% Below average	Read 245 Write 171 Mixed 180 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 9.49 45% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 25.9 DQ Mixed 9.51 11% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 99%
Multiple Card Reader 64GB 1,309 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 18GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 7.13 Mixed 6.36 12% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.14 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.85 42% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE NB10t-A-101 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE NB10t-A-101

CPU
Celeron N2810IntelBench 27%, 466 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	5x

SSD
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16