Lenovo 30B4S0TD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30B4S0TD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '16 at 16:39
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 506
46% 389 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 13.4
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 9.07
Splatting 16.1
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 501
Write 405
Mixed 415
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 26.2
97% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 113
133% 232 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback