Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '16 at 10:16
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 94.9 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 151 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 247 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100 26,726 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Sapphire(174B E258) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.155.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 26.4 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 31 22% 30.2 fps	MRender 25.5 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 36.3 24% 28.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 499GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 126281511 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11353 (05) Reallocated sector count 93 93 326 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 13149815953 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13156 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5501 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 17 17 83 (BC) Unknown 100 99 167506673788 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 107 (BE) vendor-specific 72 47 471072796 (C2) HDA temperature 28 53 73014444060 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 50 31 126281511 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 33 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 23772644005919 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3366855239 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1441855554	59.2% Above average	Read 111 Write 95.7 Mixed 99.7 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.36 84% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 68%
Toshiba MK1676GSX H 160GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 149GB free Firmware: GS001Y Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1213 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1372 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 8181 (0A) Spinup retry count 127 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1327 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 41 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 65 65 351706 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 253403987995 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 36 (DE) Loaded hours 89 89 4683 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 321 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	47.4% Average	Read 81.2 Write 83.7 Mixed 78 61% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.32 88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 48%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 160GB-$117 432 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 115GB free Firmware: YAR511W0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 204 203 10660 (04) Start/Stop count 251 251 4603 (05) Reallocated sector count 251 227 30 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 241 48229 (09) Power-on hours count 195 195 33350 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 242 242 4668 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1557 (C4) Reallocation count 157 157 96 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 230 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 157 157 96 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 197 2 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 246 7 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 223 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 152 150 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	31% Below average	Read 52.9 Write 54.6 Mixed 52.3 40% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.49 122% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%
Samsung HM020GI 20GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 9GB free Firmware: YU100-06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 2560 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 932 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7177 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 733 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1630 (C2) HDA temperature 160 124 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 69532 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4033 (FF) Unknown 253 253 0	11.2% Very poor	Read 24.9 Write 13.8 Mixed 13.1 13% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.27 61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 57.4 70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16