Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 02:37
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 145
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 422
41% 338 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.155.257
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.8% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 70.3
45% 62.7 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 51.3
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 399
Write 315
Mixed 304
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 21.5
77% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 96.7
DQ Mixed 42.6
57% 106 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 190
Mixed 166
135% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.22
109% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 8.67
Mixed 9.01
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.78
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.007
14% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04JACC31-165 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback