Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '16 at 04:19
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 880 78% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,472 91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 36FD) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 155 Parallax 145 123% 150 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 141 Splatting 111 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7100Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2,784 Write 1,487 Mixed 1,703 439% 1,992 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 38.5 117% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 436 DQ Write 365 DQ Mixed 21.6 120% 274 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 306%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 114GB free Firmware: BXV7000Q Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1,439 Write 297 Mixed 478 159% 738 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 24.8 94% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 453 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 133 166% 297 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 144%
Asrock RAM Disk 4GB 4GB free Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 190 190 21493121350 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 664 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1074 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 664 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3260 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3260 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 188980068381 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	95.5% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 170 Mixed 163 125% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.21 104% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 466GB free Firmware: 20.01H20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 142 3825 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2258 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5133 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2216 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 62 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 35607 (C2) HDA temperature 116 96 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 94 94 4630 (F1) Unknown 200 200 6123678097 (F2) Unknown 200 200 8085586530	57.2% Above average	Read 114 Write 84.8 Mixed 114 79% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.34 102% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 45.2 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 179%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	154x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	100x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	19x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 1,169 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 415 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 125% - Outstanding

Total price: $254

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16