Asrock QC5000-ITX/WiFi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock QC5000-ITX/WiFi (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	16.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '16 at 18:40
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	31% Below average	Memory 50.1 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 46.8 27% 40.1 Pts	4-Core 69.1 8-Core 80.7 10% 74.9 Pts	64-Core 89.3 6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14151 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 55 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 180390133796 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 26890529756 (F7) Unknown 100 100 841753356 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1021688922	65.4% Good	Read 365 Write 362 Mixed 263 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 21.9 82% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 82.9 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 35 38% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 107%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 369GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 30.4 Mixed 30.7 40% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.29 82% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 61%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 7GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 29.7 Mixed 29.9 39% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.23 68% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 44,086 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QC5000-ITX/WiFi Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000-ITX/WiFi

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	1x

SSD
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x

RAM
PSD34G160081 1x4GBPatriotBench 26%, 818 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $36

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16