Gigabyte GA-nForce

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	NVIDIA AWRDACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-nForce (all builds)
Memory	0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20041029
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '16 at 21:21
Run Duration	659 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3000+-$80 300 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 754, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 22.5 30% 38 Pts	4-Core 24 8-Core 28.8 4% 26.4 Pts	64-Core 29.1 2% 29.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series Gigabyte(1458 4050) 128MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.27 0% 0.23 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600AABB-00PUA0 160GB-$55 249 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00.07H00 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 159 2816 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18759 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 28 28 52883 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 803 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 351 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 18793 (C2) HDA temperature 110 92 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.1% Poor	Read 50 Write 51.4 Mixed 32.9 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.09 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 64GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 1689 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 10.3 Mixed 14.7 18% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.65 41% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 9%
Flash Drive UT_USB20 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.04% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 4.02 Mixed 0.65 6% 6.46 MB/s	4K Read 4.16 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 3 slots used 1GB DIMM Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	9.23% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.23% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16