Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '16 at 17:54
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 54.5 2-Core 113 56% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 354 36% 294 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.5% Very good	Lighting 94 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 77% 104 fps	MRender 97 Gravity 93.6 Splatting 99.2 79% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 34GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 5703506 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 41695542525295 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3012 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 69 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5703506 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5703506 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5703506 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7933 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4789 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4789 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18754	34.2% Below average	Read 187 Write 56 Mixed 71.6 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 13.8 69% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 80.1 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 20.4 27% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 51%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 54847567 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 9921374461311 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2416 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 157 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 71 51544260639 (C2) HDA temperature 31 71 51544260639 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 54847567 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 54847567 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 54847567 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16391 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6351 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6351 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6894	51.7% Above average	Read 384 Write 73.8 Mixed 126 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 16.3 94% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 32 40% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 477GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 167 6641 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8494 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18357 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5388 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 182 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 374833 (C2) HDA temperature 118 95 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.5% Below average	Read 72.2 Write 65.1 Mixed 60.1 49% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.19 69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600LL Series 1600LL Series Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.4% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 13.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.8 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16