Lenovo 3597BZ8

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 3597BZ8 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160524
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '16 at 14:17
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G860-$73 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 76 2-Core 142 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 151 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 6,989 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B A004) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.14 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.96 2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 160774600 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 68350109555985 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 157 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 106 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 35 30067064859 (C2) HDA temperature 27 35 30067064859 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 160774600 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 160774600 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 160774600 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6102 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5811 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5811 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11069 (F4) Unknown 98 98 196739138	35% Below average	Read 163 Write 89 Mixed 97.3 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 12.8 62% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 94.3 DQ Mixed 29.2 41% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 73%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 320GB free Firmware: 0502 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 22.4 Write 21.2 Mixed 22.7 17% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.31 91% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 66%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 261GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 196 194 42795 (03) Spinup time 143 140 3833 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6225 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1563 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 83 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6142 (C2) HDA temperature 110 103 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 194 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 198 1	53% Above average	Read 90 Write 94.6 Mixed 76.9 65% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,114 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 355GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 25.8 Mixed 28.7 36% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 45%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 15GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.09% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 6.86 Mixed 8.49 13% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.08 23% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.09% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5040ED58E9W1600 1x4GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.4% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3597BZ8

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)