Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100901
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '16 at 21:34
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 73.5 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 156 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 214 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8326) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4196 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 2.56 5% 5.12 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 4.27 Splatting 3.65 4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.64% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 141 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 486 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24321 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 437 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 148 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 337 (C2) HDA temperature 108 95 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.5% Good	Read 114 Write 114 Mixed 109 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.44 108% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 3GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 3.91 Mixed 6.36 10% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.38 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.93 58% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR 1333 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	27x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	76x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16