Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '16 at 00:49
Run Duration	455 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 88 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 94 51% 76.4 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 189 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 1300) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4196 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.52 fps	MRender 0.62 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD240G 240GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1230C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 81 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 555 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 98 (A3) Unknown 100 100 54 (A4) Unknown 100 100 4716 (A5) Unknown 100 100 14 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 2 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 22855 (F2) Unknown 100 100 17181 (F5) Unknown 100 100 18864	63.9% Good	Read 256 Write 230 Mixed 251 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 34.5 105% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 83.5 80% 125 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 102%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 8GB free, PID 0109, Sandisk Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	7.11% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 12 Mixed 10.9 16% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.39 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.81 52% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.11% Great: 17%
mSD Card 64GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 6GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 24.5 Mixed 31.7 40% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.61 4K Write 5.04 4K Mixed 3.3 305% 4.65 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 39%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 4.47 Mixed 6.67 11% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.92 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.6 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	531x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	255x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	447x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	259x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16