ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster ABRA A5 V6.2

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Monster ABRA A5 V6.2 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER ABRA A5 V6.2
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '16 at 14:25
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 173 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 538 54% 439 Pts	64-Core 535 33% 535 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 5500) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4501 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.33% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 13.8 Parallax 5.97 5% 8.53 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 12.3 6% 7.31 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB 3,142 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 193GB free Firmware: LSBG100 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 230 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 21 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 61 60133539889 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 15386 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 15386 (F2) Unknown 100 100 22387 (F9) Unknown 100 100 341 (FC) Unknown 100 100 2	95.7% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 408 Mixed 381 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 30 126% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 81.6 118% 219 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 89%
Intel SSDSCKJW240H6 240GB 843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 120 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 189 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 5 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 41 100 85903015977 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 15405 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 50 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 15405 (F2) Unknown 100 100 16164 (F9) Unknown 100 100 2594	84.6% Excellent	Read 500 Write 246 Mixed 295 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 26.7 134% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 67.6 93% 168 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 177 1858 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2031 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9263 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1975 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 156 156 132163 (C2) HDA temperature 117 95 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.2% Above average	Read 99 Write 100 Mixed 97.8 75% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.22 76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.4 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ABRA A5 V6.2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V6.2

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	71x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	39x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	32x

SSD
SP550NS38 240GBAdataBench 76%, 1,419 samples	17x
SSDSCKKW240H6 240GBIntelBench 76%, 3,142 samples	10x
SSDSCKJW240H6 240GBIntelBench 76%, 843 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	18x
1x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 29%, 1,721 samples	10x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 409 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback