Lenovo 6072AUF

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 6072AUF (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090824
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '16 at 17:49
Run Duration	525 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4400-$108 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 33% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 58.1 1-Core 8.4 2-Core 26.3 24% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 30.7 8-Core 29.7 4% 30.2 Pts	64-Core 32.9 2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 7,025 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1280) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 72 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 31 (A3) Unknown 100 100 310 (94) Unknown 100 100 12264 (95) Unknown 100 100 202 (96) Unknown 100 100 23 (97) Unknown 100 100 173 (A4) Unknown 100 100 4870 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 56290733916202 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 22552 (F2) Unknown 100 100 25169 (F5) Unknown 100 100 28763 (F6) Unknown 100 100 24528 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	29.7% Poor	Read 202 Write 117 Mixed 68.4 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 9.26 44% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 38.1 DQ Mixed 8.41 13% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 91%
EMC LIFELINE-DISK 107GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 100GB free Firmware: 2 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.95% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 7.8 Mixed 9.86 7% 9.63 MB/s	4K Read 3.44 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 2.68 476% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 42%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 15GB free, PID 0804 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 11.5 Mixed 19 24% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.57 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.42 55% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 20%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	6.05% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 8.89 Mixed 12 16% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.55 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 18% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 6072AUF

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)