Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateSep 30 '16 at 08:14
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 170
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 639
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 1,629
101% 1,629 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 97.7
85% 96.2 fps
MRender 86.6
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 77.5
70% 86 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
150GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 482
Write 382
Mixed 402
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 20.5
79% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 88.7
92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 360
Write 104
Mixed 139
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 11.3
64% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 42.1
57% 106 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 87%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
357GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 86.9
Mixed 87.7
67% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.23
98% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
204GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 93.2
Write 78.2
Mixed 78.6
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.31
102% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
44GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 150
Write 96
Mixed 111
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.26
99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $430
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback