Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '16 at 10:32
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 129 2-Core 261 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 668 70% 560 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 67.8 54% 67.7 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 61.7 Splatting 54.9 50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193 568 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 72GB free Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2742300 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 68719481481 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 858 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 297 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 75 51544522778 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2742300 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2742300 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2742300 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15231 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19712 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19712 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24721	59.7% Above average	Read 197 Write 164 Mixed 141 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 15.9 117% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 39.6 69% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1504 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1104 (B1) Unknown 98 98 40 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 55 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 52 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10433832664	112% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 396 Mixed 414 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 43.5 176% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 104 136% 247 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 232GB free Firmware: ES2OA60W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 197 197 144 (03) Spinup time 214 214 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2503 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 120 120 32 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3301 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2476 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 180 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 53350 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 214749216794 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	47.2% Average	Read 81.4 Write 83.1 Mixed 76.2 60% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.33 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 46%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 116GB free Firmware: 04.01G04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 186 184 1658 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5330 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8362 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4803 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 197 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 178 178 68687 (C2) HDA temperature 119 79 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	25.1% Poor	Read 44.4 Write 42.7 Mixed 44.3 33% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.16 65% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.5 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 18.7 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,617x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	442x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	403x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16