Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '16 at 16:16
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 315
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 67.1
62% 72.6 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 71.8
58% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 300GB-$289
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 261
Write 208
Mixed 160
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 18.2
76% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 63.6
DQ Mixed 34.3
45% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
28GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 500
Write 339
Mixed 272
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 23.9
130% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 63.2
87% 161 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 108%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
22GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 265
Write 81.8
Mixed 124
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 17.3
109% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 31.4
40% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
113GB free
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.4
Write 82.9
Mixed 23.5
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.39
97% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
584GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 91.8
Write 92.7
Mixed 21.6
82% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 9.91
Mixed 15.9
21% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.93
4K Mixed 1.49
167% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback