Asus X750JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus X750JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X750JA
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '16 at 14:55
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 127
36% 234 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 122D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4501
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 7.03
4% 6.24 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 8.35
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 470
Write 384
Mixed 389
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 29.3
128% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 19.2
53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
659GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 81.8
Write 79.2
Mixed 78.7
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.32
70% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
30GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 15.8
Mixed 14.1
23% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.25
22% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 16
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X750JA Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $401
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback