Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3775 931 User benchmarks, average bench 32% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 42.7 28% 39.5 Pts	4-Core 67.9 8-Core 76.1 9% 72 Pts	64-Core 82 5% 82 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 14ED) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.91 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.11 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.9% Poor	Read 161 Write 75.7 Mixed 99.5 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 4.28 43% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 21.2 DQ Mixed 3.64 7% 14.4 MB/s

HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 466GB free, PID 17f9 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 96.2 Write 97.7 Mixed 94.3 124% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.17 58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8.1 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom Z3775IntelBench 32%, 931 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	1x

RAM
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16