Clevo X7200

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Clevo X7200 (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO X7200
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110621
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '16 at 02:46
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 95.4 1-Core 82 2-Core 150 68% 109 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 433 43% 350 Pts	64-Core 511 32% 511 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M 34 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Clevo(1558 7200) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	8.05% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 12.2 7% 12.2 fps	MRender 17.3 Gravity 8.63 Splatting 12 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 39GB free Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6278 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1224 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 234 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 119358 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	44% Average	Read 256 Write 107 Mixed 152 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 7.38 78% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 49.1 56% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 13 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19835 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1224 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 273 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 651276 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 95 95 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	36.4% Below average	Read 252 Write 88.1 Mixed 138 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 5.72 59% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 54.8 DQ Mixed 35.4 43% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 46%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 94GB free Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 75 45423687 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13496 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 60703280 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 42847 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1246 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 16932 (BC) Unknown 100 90 94490722375 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 48 707002405 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 253277 (C2) HDA temperature 37 52 68719476773 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 47 43 45423687 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 1 157 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 1 157 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 33436320408919 (F1) Unknown 100 253 367865087 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3442538141 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	37.3% Below average	Read 63.8 Write 66.1 Mixed 59.7 48% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 58%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 324GB free, PID ab24 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 28.4 Mixed 28 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.36 81% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 20.5 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 56 72% 56 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X7200 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Clevo X7200

CPU
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples	9x
Core i7 970Intel $1,141Bench 73%, 4,313 samples	6x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 580MNvidiaBench 13%, 434 samples	6x
GeForce GTX 485MNvidiaBench 11%, 63 samples	5x
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	4x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	3x
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	2x
530 Series 180GBIntelBench 71%, 4,011 samples	2x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	12x
3x8GBUnknownBench 47%, 7,706 samples	5x
18GBUnknownBench 42%, 8,131 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $612

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16