Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite CL15t-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA MA20
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '16 at 01:47
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 24.4 2-Core 48.6 32% 45.7 Pts	4-Core 47.5 8-Core 48.8 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 48.3 3% 48.3 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FBB8) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.91 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 032GE4 31GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 152 Write 64.6 Mixed 95 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 8.5 52% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 19.2 DQ Mixed 8.48 10% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16