Fujitsu S6421

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu S6421  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB1E6
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '16 at 10:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 91.1
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 48.7
41% 54 Pts
4-Core 42.5
8-Core 46.6
6% 44.5 Pts
64-Core 35
2% 35 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Fujitsu(10CF 1450) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.53
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 44.9
Write 31.7
Mixed 42.6
30% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.14
20% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback