MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7845
MotherboardMSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '16 at 10:43
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 567
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.134.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 68.1
42% 51.4 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 43.1
35% 42.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 498
Write 250
Mixed 334
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 13.5
82% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 55.6
DQ Mixed 48.1
34% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
828GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40% Average
Read 67.9
Write 71.7
Mixed 68.9
52% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.38
75% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
246GB free
Firmware: STDOA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 61.1
Mixed 64.6
48% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
34GB free
Firmware: CP100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 48.9
Mixed 54.2
38% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.32
70% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
17GB free
Firmware: CP100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 47.9
Write 57.7
Mixed 47.2
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.3
81% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
738GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 107
Write 115
Mixed 112
145% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
WD 7500AAV External 750GB
510GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 42
Write 40.6
Mixed 36
50% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.39
84% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback