Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateSep 11 '16 at 06:24
Run Duration463 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 144
59% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 429
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
PwrHis(1787 2360) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 27.7
18% 26.6 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 32.3
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0919A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 505
Write 448
Mixed 478
106% 477 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 20.3
96% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 54.4
50% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 135
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.22
108% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 96%
Staples Relay UFD 4GB
1GB free, PID 5202
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 4.08
Mixed 5.56
8% 7.91 MB/s
4K Read 5.46
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 1.25
115% 2.75 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 12%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
0GB free, PID 1e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 6.83
Mixed 8.37
11% 10 MB/s
4K Read 7.83
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
30% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback