Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 08 '16 at 08:46
Run Duration688 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 587
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
MSI(1462 3235) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 107
Parallax 106
82% 105 fps
MRender 89
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 87.8
74% 90.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1122 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3540000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 459
Mixed 423
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 18.7
107% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 65.2
105% 204 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
83GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 463
Write 275
Mixed 262
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 10.5
68% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 37.2
89% 188 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
44GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 433
Write 230
Mixed 240
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 11.6
68% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 36.6
92% 197 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
496GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 105
Mixed 113
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.21
74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
385GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 79.3
Write 60.8
Mixed 71.2
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.33
74% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 58%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
318GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 106
Write 61.5
Mixed 72.3
60% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.12
54% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
164GB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 72.2
Write 67.9
Mixed 71.3
53% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
14GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 28.2
Mixed 33.5
25% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.15
41% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
3.5TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 160
Write 102
Mixed 88.4
137% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 7.55
4K Mixed 0.61
280% 3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 1TB
189GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 36
Mixed 18.9
37% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.15
63% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 43%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 128GB
7GB free, PID 4064
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 8.95
Mixed 10.6
15% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.48
51% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
4GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 138
Write 55.3
Mixed 58
91% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.97
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.54
75% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
Sony Storage Media 4GB
3GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 7.97
Mixed 11.4
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.97
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
23% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 8%
USB Flash Memory 4GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 22.8
Write 8.2
Mixed 12.1
16% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 44.3
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 110%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $982
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback