| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP hp workstation xw8200 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 08B4h |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20060531 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 27 '16 at 08:34 |
| Run Duration | 416 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
|
30.2%
Below average
|
29% 42.9 Pts
|
7% 50.3 Pts
|
3% 50.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5921
|
4.05%
Terrible
|
4% 4.5 fps
|
4% 4.91 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
53% 72.5 MB/s
|
79% 0.66 MB/s
| |
|
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
31GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
36% 28.1 MB/s
|
57% 0.69 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
6GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
12% 13.5 MB/s
|
90% 1.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.7%
Very poor
|
10% 3.63 GB/s
|
9% 3.27 GB/s
|
26% 152 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP hp workstation xw8200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 31%, 33 samples | 1x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples | 1x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 3.80GHz1stBench 33%, 11 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |