Asus N82JQ

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus N82JQ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N82JQ
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '16 at 06:03
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 113 60% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 211 24% 185 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M 977 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1342) 1GB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8916 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 1.62 3% 3.86 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 2.73 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 9 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 51 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20555920	43.2% Average	Read 262 Write 191 Mixed 137 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 12.8 51% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 50.3 58% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 251GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 84 26968456 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4284 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 37 (07) Seek error rate 68 59 301069801172 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12943 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4204 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 5435 (BC) Unknown 100 97 1407 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 25 132740848353315 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 323 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 524 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 79 79 42361 (C2) HDA temperature 35 75 94489280547 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 47 36 26968456 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 9 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 9 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -40140764335396 (F1) Unknown 100 253 328846006 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1629031841 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	52.7% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 87.5 Mixed 54.5 59% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.47 98% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Asint SSZ3128M8-EDJED 1x2GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.9 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N82JQ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N82JQ

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	19x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples	20x

SSD
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJED 6GBUnknownBench 35%, 3 samples	2x
99U5469-035.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 81 samples	2x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16