Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '16 at 09:40
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 426 57% 426 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% MSI(1462 3411) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2511.1001 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	0.31% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 69.9 Parallax 1.56 0% 23.9 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.09 0% 0.64 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 0.31% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 15221 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4064 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 110 (AE) Unknown 100 100 111 (B5) Unknown 100 100 69218167038642 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 86 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 106 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	59.4% Above average	Read 471 Write 186 Mixed 249 66% 302 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 5.48 85% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 7.47 39% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 72%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3FD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 106 (03) Spinup time 122 122 51578012250 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1182 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2967 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 805 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1188 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1188 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 249109020705 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.9% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 101 Mixed 95.2 74% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.39 98% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 68%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 656GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 172 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5270 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14801 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3900 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 116 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5153 (C2) HDA temperature 112 92 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.8% Very good	Read 134 Write 116 Mixed 122 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.45 136% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB 4,039 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.2 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 20.5 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	392x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	381x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	352x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	399x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	346x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	114x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	55x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16