Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '16 at 09:17
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 352
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 48.2
38% 50.4 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 55.7
46% 56.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 408
Mixed 412
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 27.5
146% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 52.3
63% 115 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
745GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 163
Mixed 150
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.37
132% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 109%
Inateck FE2005 480GB
348GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 328
Write 178
Mixed 208
279% 238 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 2.71
2,295% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 1.34
2,634% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 283%
Great: 303%
OTG OTG 120GB
39GB free, PID 2012
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 293
Mixed 126
255% 186 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 9.76
2,405% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 9.92
2,862% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 269%
Great: 266%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback