Packard EasyNote LS11HR

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Packard EasyNote LS11HR (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV70_HR
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110711
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '16 at 21:47
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 156 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 344 40% 309 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0513) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.14 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9557 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3034 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 48 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2432 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4015560773	67.6% Good	Read 480 Write 337 Mixed 351 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 16.9 69% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 61.9 72% 126 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 118%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 437GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 171 1808 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20365 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17009 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3516 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 1447 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 240 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 119 119 245275 (C2) HDA temperature 114 98 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	53.5% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 97.9 Mixed 88 69% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 50%
Samsung S2 Portable 1TB 1,558 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 149GB free, PID 1f08 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 31.9 Mixed 28.5 39% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.23 38% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-012.A00LF 1x4GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.7 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote LS11HR Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LS11HR

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	10x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	8x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	8x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	32x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	8x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	6x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 1x4GBMicronBench 24%, 2,440 samples	4x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	3x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16