Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision T1650
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1650 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '15 at 07:18
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 93 2-Core 184 63% 139 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 362 48% 362 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E127) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.920.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.86 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 40 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 78 78 783 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9152 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31668014179 (F2) Unknown 99 99 16906222425	45.8% Average	Read 348 Write 92.5 Mixed 146 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 11.6 77% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 88.3 DQ Write 88.9 DQ Mixed 49.1 48% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 107%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 436GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 170 1400 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 80 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 24 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 50240 (C2) HDA temperature 116 105 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 314 (F1) Unknown 200 200 151950410 (F2) Unknown 200 200 842065472 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	63.2% Good	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 104 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.28 103% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 65%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 360GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 172 1183 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 74 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8750 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (BF) G-sense error rate 96 96 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 49258 (C2) HDA temperature 119 105 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 494 (F1) Unknown 200 200 3776407165 (F2) Unknown 200 200 3915349076 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	59.7% Above average	Read 96 Write 112 Mixed 102 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.28 100% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	307x
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples	147x
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	81x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	73x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	63x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	50x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	21x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)