Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '16 at 12:42
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 80.9 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 238 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 733 72% 589 Pts	64-Core 887 55% 887 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 149 Parallax 140 110% 142 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 132 Splatting 110 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 12 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 62 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 299499567	90.9% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 404 Mixed 397 96% 434 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 32.2 128% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 53.2 71% 126 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 100 34182320 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 11 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 100997 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 65 538837022 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 87 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 98784247838 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 127289945751560 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1120571636 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10279658	109% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 186 Mixed 180 140% 186 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.25 91% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 113%
Samsung STORY Station 1.5TB 903 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 781GB free, PID 5f06 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 41.7 Mixed 40.2 52% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.31 66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%
USB DISK Pro 16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 3623 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.64% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 12.8 Mixed 10.7 18% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.86 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.04 46% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165 6,271 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 45.6 MC Mixed 39.8 121% 42.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	23x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	8x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	5x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	4x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	3x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 99U5702-094.A00G 16GBUnknownBench 65%, 7 samples	6x
9965600-012.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 64GBUnknownBench 104%, 5 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 76%, 7,414 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16