Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '16 at 21:15
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 199
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 502
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2401.1002
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.7% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 56.2
37% 43.9 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 37.6
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 506
Write 405
Mixed 226
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 31.6
112% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 93.5
104% 178 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 134%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
111GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 488
Write 257
Mixed 304
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 5.78
63% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 6
57% 132 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 74%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 169
Mixed 136
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.36
131% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 112%
ADATA HDD SH93 500GB
285GB free, PID a93a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 25
Mixed 26.3
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.19
18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $261
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback