Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '16 at 19:00
Run Duration	413 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 57.3 2-Core 103 51% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 210 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 2966) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Lighting 50.3 Reflection 47.3 Parallax 41.7 41% 46.4 fps	MRender 40.1 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 38.6 33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 23653553 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -136167643142593 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 620 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 151 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 46 55837589539 (C2) HDA temperature 35 46 55837589539 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 23653553 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 23653553 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 23653553 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16716 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19659 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19659 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18615	43.2% Average	Read 253 Write 120 Mixed 160 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 14.3 71% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 34.1 45% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 90GB free Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 132 132 12896043186 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2203 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9780 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 612 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2268 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2268 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 210454249506 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74.8% Very good	Read 114 Write 147 Mixed 147 103% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.16 61% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,115 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 650GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 24.1 Mixed 12.9 26% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.19 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 6GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	8.78% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 3.33 Mixed 2.39 7% 8.33 MB/s	4K Read 3.83 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.98 96% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.78% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 52217, 52217 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.3% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16